About this time last year, our outreach committee (of which I am a member) began planning our church’s participation in the community’s Fourth of July parade. It’s a big deal. Literally everyone in town shows up. Consequently, it has been a priority event for our church for years—a chance to connect with the community and tell them about church ministries.
So, after all our planning, a record breaking four people showed up to build the float. Three of us were on the committee. Complete disaster.
Our initial complaint, of course, was that we few folks had to build the float alone; and we just knew that although no one else showed up to help, we would nevertheless hear our share of criticism: What’s that supposed to be? Oh, I would never have guessed… More significantly, the lack of participation suggested that this years-old tradition was losing its importance in our congregation.
Many commentators argue that church programs are a thing of the past. People don’t want to be kept busy serving an institution; they want to invest in meaningful relationships. “Faithful” members feel obligated to be involved in every program, which means they have no time to truly invest in people.
I suspect that’s true. As a project on the outreach program ticket, the Independence Day parade registered little interest. But my experience suggests that while people may be burned out on program-heavy ministry, very few take the initiative to minister outside of programs. That is, most people still want to serve as part of something established and organized.
So, what do you do when participation in church programs wanes and with them goes your interaction with the broader community?
One thing our church has done is to partner with an established a youth and family services organization in town. We have a close relationship with the program director, so it’s easy for our members to get involved with their projects. Volunteering for a day to help hang shelves, prepare back-to-school bags, or tutor elementary students is a less daunting commitment than signing up for a weekly program. Besides, the results are (in many cases) immediate, and volunteers don’t have to plan the event; they simply show up and do the work. In other words, this opportunity provides all the benefits of a church program without the baggage.
Our church has also hosted a back-to-school clinic in our facility. It is run by an outside organization, but our church provides the space, and our members volunteer to translate, prepare snacks, and administrate in other ways. This event puts people in direct contact with the community, but is not labor intensive and does not require sustained participation. It’s not perceived as an “outreach program,” but as an authentic way to meet a genuine need in the community.
I’m interested to hear your thoughts. Have you noticed waning interest in programs? What have you done to counter the lack of participation?
Tags used in this post:
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.christianitytoday.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1030







Comments
I think your experience with the float program that all of us who have struggled to pull the dead weight of programs that have lost (or never had) congregational support.
I appreciate your suggestion of looking outward into the community of people doing good work for the community OUTSIDE the church to provide focus and structure for individuals to plug into and help without major commitment or planning.
However, I think that the lack of individuals "reaching out" to their communities outside of church programs is a symptom of a deeper need for helping those individuals see their role within the Kingdom of God as primarily one of missional transformation of their community as opposed to attraction of "prospects" to the congregation. This openness begins with connecting more widely with groups outside the church who have already been at this work, as well as with other congregations, and religious organizations.
For more on how to help a congregation through this process see Mark Lau Branson. For more on building relationships within the community and for focusing church ministry on community needs see Robert Linthicum.
Posted by: Matt Lumpkin | March 17, 2008 12:58 PM