Off the Agenda
Search
Off the Agenda

Off the Agenda: Conversations for Building Church Leaders

10-1-shouldchurchesdifferen.jpg

As a show of solidarity with my seven-year-old daughter, I recently reread the classic Little House on the Prairie books and Anne of Green Gables. One phenomenon I noticed this time around (probably because I’m in the habit of thinking about church leadership) was that the books’ good, churchgoing characters didn’t have to choose between churches of various sizes and stripes. They simply attended the church in town and enjoyed (or put up with) the teachings of Reverend So-and-So every Sunday.

My, how things have changed. Along with the constant and dizzying array of choices we face every day, we have the luxury of choosing the church we like best. I know some small towns and villages in our country still have only one church. But in most of those cases, people live within driving distance of other communities and might choose to drive to one of them to attend another church. And the situation is very different where I live—in some areas I can find a church on every block. And on a recent trip to the area around Fort Worth, Texas, I thought I saw at least two churches on every block.

Sometimes I wonder how people make sense of the selection and choose a church to attend. I have my own preferences and when moving to a new area, I’ve chosen the comforts of my “home” denomination. But many churches downplay their denominational affiliation, if they have one. It actually can be hard to discover. And for people without the constraints of denominational preference—and especially those for whom church attendance is not a long-ingrained habit—how do they make a selection? I’m not sure how I would (apart from visiting every church in town and depending on the guidance of the Holy Spirit).

Some churches don’t seem all that concerned about this question, while for others it seems of primary concern. Some churches have learned to differentiate and market themselves smoothly; others try but stumble awkwardly. In both smooth and awkward attempts, churches often subtly put down other churches, implying that they’re the only ones who’ve finally got it right. (We’re the friendly church. We’re the fun ones. We’ll welcome you. You won’t feel judged here.) I know what this communicates to me; I wonder what it says to people on the outside looking in.

So in their efforts to attract people, should churches differentiate themselves from one another? Should they highlight their attractive features somehow without implying that other churches are less attractive? Should they call attention to themselves at all? And if they should be promoting their individuality, what sorts of differentiation do you believe make sense to people who are looking for a church?

What do you think?

1.jpg
Amy Simpson is Executive Director of the Leadership Media Group at Christianity Today International.

Posted by Rachel Willoughby at 7:00 AM on October 2, 2008 | Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.christianitytoday.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1568

Comments

Churches differentiate themselves by their actions and demeanor, whether they intend to or not. The real question is whether churches should advertise this differentiation in a way that makes them seem "better" than others. For instance, I often cringe when seeing a newspaper ad for a church that highlights such things as "relevant preaching" (differentiating it from other non-relevant churches...even if it's true), "God-exalting worship" (as if other forms of worship aren't God-honoring, etc. Such transparent differentiation seems to make it more of a human-centric marketing appeal than I'm comfortable with.

Good thought provoking question. hmmm,

I think churches ought to differentiate - to the extent that each church has a unique focus in their community, and I think it's important for each church to identify that focus for themselves. I also believe that our "dirty laundry" should be handled quietly with grace.

I don't believe we can ignore what most of the world already knows, that churches are flawed. Jesus certainly didn't hesitate to decry the religious leaders of his day in public. He even went so far as to clear the temple area of economic opportunists at one point, because they had made the temple a "den of thieves". We see Paul instructing the Corinthians in matters of church discipline, and John relays instructions to the seven churches in his Revelation of Jesus Christ. One of those churches was even described as conducting church while Christ was standing outside the door knocking to come in.

So, I think it's important to differentiate yet our differences should always be seasoned with grace. God set one standard for the world to know that we are his disciples - that we love one another. Yes, the thinking reader will recognize by inference that we feel that some things are lacking in "other" churches. But hopefully they will also see that these are things we are trying to address in our own community of faith, not that we are trying to make every other church look bad.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Remember This?