3 Questions for Lynne Baab
How can churches be smarter with websites, brochures, and other visual media?

As you talked to church leaders, what were some common fears that they expressed about technology in the church?
Probably the biggest fear is that online relationships aren't real—that the only thing that matters in terms of relationships is face-to-face communication. One of the funny things I learned while working on my PhD was that when the telephone came into use during the early 1900s, the exact same fears were expressed. People thought that the telephone was going to ruin real relationships. If you've ever lived far away from people that you love, the telephone is a huge and wonderful way to stay in touch. Yes, the telephone can interrupt dinner at the wrong hour and disrupt relationships if it rings and someone goes to answer it when they should really stay talking with the person that they're in the same room with. But by and large, telephones have been a blessing with a few complications.
That's what I always want to say to people in ministry about the online world. Real relationships can be nurtured through e-mails, through connections on social networking sites, through information that's given by websites. Nobody who advocates the use of these methods of communication is saying that people should spend all their time online, but real relationships can be nurtured.
In your book Reaching Out in a Networked World you talk about visual literacy—learning to read what images and fonts and graphics are communicating unintentionally to people who view them. What might a church's website be communicating unintentionally to visitors?
Many things. Fonts are a good example. They have personalities—not the basic, plain ones—but many of the decorative fonts do. They might be quirky or they might be casual or they might be elegant, so it's important to use those fonts carefully to be sure that the font communicates what the words are saying. That's one place where miscommunication happens.
Another place is in the photos. Let's say a congregation is very proud of its building, and the only photo on the church's homepage is one of the building. Is that really what the congregation wants to communicate—that their building is the most important thing? Lots of churches have cool buildings and maybe there should be a photo of the building somewhere on the homepage, but if what is central in a congregation is the relationships between the people or the intergenerational ministry that's done on mission trips or the worship service—well, a photo of that, whatever that main thing is, should be on the homepage.
Links communicate a lot as well. If all of your links are to things within your congregation, you inadvertently communicate that you're not engaged with the wider community. If all your links are to activities that only a member would want to be engaged in, then you're inadvertently communicating that you don't welcome new people. If you want to welcome new people, then you need some links on the homepage to activities where people can get easily involved.
So it's really significant to look over a website with the various audiences in mind and make sure that there's no inadvertent communication.
How would a pastor or church leader who wanted to be intentional about how they're presenting the church in websites or brochures—how would they learn to be visually literate? Is it enough for them to be aware that they need to be intentional?
I think visual literacy for most Protestant Christians is going to be something that takes us the rest of our lives to learn. It's not easy. It's not something that we automatically understand because we've been raised to believe that words are the most important thing. Words are hugely important. Words provide anchors for photos and visual images. Words give concrete instructions that visual images can't, but we need to look at visual literacy as a skill to learn over the years to come.
Here are some things that people can do: thumb through a magazine and look at the pictures and think about how each picture affects you. Look at the websites of the churches of all your friends and think about the impression each homepage gives you. Look at the websites of big corporations and organizations—maybe the symphony in your city or the city council—and look at the way they present themselves. Think about the way the visual components work together. Watch TV advertisements without the sound on and pay attention to the way the visual images work—watch what they communicate.
These are just a few examples of ways to increase visual literacy. It's going to be a long, long journey for most of us because we haven't been trained in it.
For more on websites …
Tags used in this post:
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.christianitytoday.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2039







Comments
I'm intrigued by Baab's assertion that the prominence of images present unique challenges for Protestants. I've even read some conservatives rail against the rise of the image, fearful that it will compromise our emphasis on the word. I think that tension is partly alleviated if we think of the Word's primary referent as being Christ and that it refers only in secondary sense to the written word. Words on a page did not become flesh--Jesus did. Yes, the Bible is a word-based medium, but it proclaims a three dimensional, living Savior.
Posted by: Drew Dyck | March 2, 2009 9:34 AM
I'm more than surprised at Lynne's comment about visual literacy being difficult for protestants. Maybe it's because I'm more of a non-conformist as a Baptist but I don't think we are much different to the Protestant.
In New Zealand there is huge use of the Visual to communicate in Churches compared to many other parts of the world. In fact many NZ Churches are often really exciting places to be for this very reason. There are numbers of more conservative Churches that use little of the visual, but they also tend to lack in other areas which is reflected in their gradual & sad decline. Within the Multi-Cultural & other Culture experiences the visual has always been especially important and has become more so in the growing Protestant Chuches. Otago is somewhat more conservative than other parts of NZ but that certainly does not apply to the rest of us.
Posted by: Gary Colville | March 5, 2009 11:14 PM
I'm fairly new to New Zealand so I'll very much look forward to experiencing more of the ways NZ Christians engage with the visual. What I noticed in the United States before I left was that many churches are throwing themselves into the visual arts and using visuals on projection screens and websites, but they haven't thought very deeply about how visual communication works. For example, in my research on congregational websites, in many instances the ministers and congregational leaders provide the verbal text for the websites, but leave the visuals up to the website designer, who may or may not even be associated with the church. These ministers know that visuals are necessary but don't want to "waste" time considering the visual impact of the website because they still believe that the words are most significant in communication.
Posted by: Lynne Baab | March 6, 2009 4:30 PM